A little thematic music.
I imagine June 20, 1966, was a proud day for my grandfather.
That was the day his son, newly minted Master’s of Science in Management degree in hand, started work at his first post-collegiate job — at a nice, steady, reliable Fortune 500 company.
This was a company a dad could be proud of, too. No tanks or napalm or thalidomide rolled off its production lines.
Its products came in sunny yellow boxes, familiar around the world. And every box came packed with the promise of happy memories just waiting to be experienced and preserved.
Sounds like a can’t-fail business proposition, right?
Eastman Kodak Co., like a termitic old oak, has been dying from the inside out for years. The company may be bankrupt by the time you read this, even if it hasn’t yet said as much. A share of its stock is no longer worth enough to buy a fast-food cheeseburger.
My dad, who spent 32 years at Kodak, sheds no tears at the looming end of an era. He mentally separated himself from the place the day he retired, and hasn’t looked back since. (He is also smart, or lucky, enough not to have to rely on the company for significant retirement benefits.)
I’m a little more sentimental about what may be Kodak’s final decline. As someone who reaped all of Kodak’s benefits without any of its headaches, I think the company had a lot to do with shaping the course of my family — more for good than ill.
For one thing, my dad’s first job came with a deferment that helped keep him out of Vietnam. His actual work was only remotely related to any sort of government contract … not that he called anybody’s attention to that.
Also, my dad’s Kodak salary carried the bulk of our household costs when I was a child. My dad played gigs around town, and my mom taught violin lessons out of our home. But I’m not sure those things put together added up to a really significant flow of income.
The roof over our head, the food on our table and the cars in our driveway owed their presence, predominantly, to my dad’s paycheck. I’m sure that situation was in force at thousands of other tract houses in the suburbs ringing Rochester.
(My most recent blog post talked about the process by which a non-relative gets assimilated into a family. The same is true of companies. In good times or bad, a major employer practically becomes another presence around dinner tables all over town. My father and his friends called their company “Mother Yellow,” a name as revealing as it was sardonic.)

Me circa 1983, sporting the Kodak logo on my jaunty ski tuque. My brother had the same tuque in yellow.
Kodak was there with a National Merit Scholarship when I finished putting in my time in high school. I held that scholarship tightly, like a prized snapshot, for all four years. That money, combined with a smaller scholarship from my school, enabled me to get four years of college for the price of three — a bargain of some consequence, given the cost of the overpriced Eastern liberal-arts school where I went to college.
This is not to say that life as a Kodak family was all cloudless skies and bright green grass.
The company was already bleeding jobs by the time I was a teenager. I can remember my dad at the dinner table, circa 1990, matter-of-factly telling my mom that he wasn’t sure he’d have a job in a year’s time.
Years later, my dad told me about a troubled time — sometime in the ’90s, I think — when he skipped ahead six or eight months in his electronic calendar and left himself a note saying, “If you’re still here to read this message, go out and celebrate.” He was, and he did.
When Facebook came along, I found out that several of my old schoolmates attributed their fathers’ heart attacks to their tenure at Kodak. My dad got out with his health and (most of) his sanity, but he might have been ahead of the game.
Also, being a Kodak family meant early access to the company’s latest products — not always a good thing in those years. We have a few Kodak instant prints in our family photo collection, of uniformly dismal quality. We were also early adopters of Ma Yellow’s disc camera, an “innovation” so daft it makes Qwikster look like sliced bread.
Still, I think of Kodak as a place that enabled an awful lot of people over the decades to attain a comfortable middle-class standard of living. That seems to get harder and harder every year in this country. The loss of a company that took care of its people (even as its bureaucracy gave them migraines) is something to regret.
It is doubly regrettable given that western New York is not throbbing with economic opportunity. What are the odds that some other company will come along and move into that landmark downtown tower, not to mention the other office space arrayed around it? The people of Rochester are used to dealing with Kodak’s decline, but the possibility of it not being there at all is something else again.
When the company goes, I will miss it. Not for what it’s become, but for what it was, and for what it provided to a lot of people in my hometown.
For those of us who still shoot film sometimes, there’s still a promise of brightness and happiness inside each yellow box. Unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be much of that left for the company behind the box.
As always, very well-written! Thanks!
I know you plan your blog posts weeks in advance; I can’t believe how prescient (or lucky) you were to post this today, just as Kodak made weekend news with bankruptcy speculations.
I suspect my father was proud of my getting a Masters and going to work for a well-respected company – doubly proud probably because he was such a photo bug. The only factual error I noted was that my degree is not an MBA, but a Master of Science in Management (RPI’s technical, one-year version of an MBA).
Much has been written about Kodak, and much more will be. Those of us involved with equipment design and manufacturing at Kodak KNEW well over 15 years ago that there would be Harvard Business Cases written about us – the problem of dealing with success. Kodak’s film and film processing business was so insanely profitable that management couldn’t face the prospect of ruining it with digital photography. So they let Sony, Canon, Olympus, and many many others ruin it for us! It’s hard to kill the goose that laid the golden egg…
Even worse, the digital camera was invented at Kodak by Steve Sasson (who holds the patent), an RPI grad who is receiving the Lifetime Achievement award from RPI this year! He worked with my buddy and drummer Brad Paxton, and the two of them demonstrated digital photography to then-CEO Colby Chandler in 1987 (I believe). Brad was so disheartened by management’s reluctance to pursue it seriously that he took early retirement in 1991.
Somehow, Rochester has already borne the brunt of Kodak’s slide into mediocrity and now worse. In the early 1980s, Kodak employed 160,000 people worldwide, nearly half of whom were in Rochester. I noticed a news article on Friday which mentioned that CEO Perez had given a talk to Kodak’s 19,000 worldwide employees, less than half of whom are in Rochester. Y’know what struck me as sad? The $160M credit line, bond downgrades, and bankruptcy speculations didn’t even make the front page of Rochester’s newspaper last week. It’s already over; Kodak is a non-entity in its home town!
I’ve had a lot of good luck in my life; reaching early retirement age in 1998 when Kodak allowed you to take your retirement in a lump sum is probably the single biggest stroke!
You didn’t seem to think much of it but I think this is one of your best blogs yet! Tx!
Your Fadda
Tx for the correction. I’ve fixed your degree.
I was inspired (such as I was) to write this over the weekend. The post originally planned for today has been bumped off into the future.
Coincidentally, it also involves photography.
You make a good point about the D&C — though, really, I wouldn’t use that paper as a barometer of anything.
(The D&C is a non-entity in its own home town. Or at least it should be.)
I once read some online wise-acre say that the point where Kodak ignored digital photography was “the moment when they stopped shooting themselves in the foot and started shooting themselves in the head.”
Fantastic post.
This was a very timely post for me. I haven’t followed Kodak news for years, but just by chance I had a conversation about Kodak with some friends over lunch today. We were discussing the current state of research in the pharmaceutical industry, which has a lot in common with Kodak though the reasons are different. I should really thank your dad for providing the specifics that I couldn’t recall over lunch. By the time my dad was forced out of Kodak, he had a laundry list of technologies that management chose to pass on that might have helped save the business.
I have one nit-picky point regarding thalidomide. It may not be the best example of malevolent chemical. The teratogenic effects seen when the drug was given as a treatment to pregnant women decades ago were tragic for sure, but the compound has some beneficial effects, too. I believe it is the primary drug for the treatment of Hanson’s disease (previously known as leprosy), and it has also found new life as a potential cancer therapy.
Keep up the good work!
–Chip
Thank you for the compliments. Will you be posting now that baseball season’s over?
Thanks also for the defense of thalidomide. I vaguely remembered that it had some reason for existing — i.e., that it was beneficial in some use — but couldn’t remember what it was.
A potential cancer therapy? Very interesting.
Yeah, I need to get back to my blog. I already know what my approach to posting will be, I just haven’t gotten off my ass to do it yet….but I will. I mean it.
(Submitted to 5,478 Days by Brad Paxton and copied here.)
Kurt…
Love your writing style…just finishing a book on “Handprint Data Capture”, and I know how much work it really is to write well (no, it won’t be a NYT Best-Seller). However, it is based on my work since I left Kodak, largely working with the U.S. Census Bureau. We helped them use digital electronic imaging for the first time in the 2000 Census, and it’s an inside joke that I was more successful getting the Census Bureau to use electronics than I was Kodak.
Your Dad & I worked at Kodak during the “good days” for sure, and enjoyed playing great jazz gigues in Rochester with some fine musicians. Rod will recall the night at the ChatterBox Club with bassist Barney Mallon and horn player Sal Sparazza. Colby Chandler was there with a gaggle of Kodak managers and their spouses, and I asked Colby if there was a tune we could play for him and his wife. He said no, anything would be fine, and so we played “Someday My Prints Will Come”. The only one who laughed was Colby, which looking back, was a symbol of part of the problem.
Regards,
Brad Paxton
[…] post was originally written last October, but was bumped by breaking news for a post about Kodak. I rescheduled it for this week — just in time for Kodak bankruptcy rumors to hit the world […]
[…] A remembrance of Mother Yellow in her senescence. (The funeral will be any time […]
[…] and a month old, was waved along to college. After college, a professional deferment related to his job at Eastman Kodak and the birth of my older brother carried him through the remainder of the […]
[…] dad graduated from college, got his first job and got a new […]
[…] you’ve never read my “Blues for Mother Yellow” post about my dad’s corporate career, go read it now. I’ve been forming words […]
[…] Allegedly, the two kids are modeled on my brother and I, dropped into an unfamiliar setting. If you read this blog regularly, you’ve seen that red tuque before. […]
[…] 1911 through Rochester, New York — a city that would pop up again in Blumenau family affairs 55 years later. Coincidental, but […]
[…] the early 1980s, as a grown man with a family and a corporate job, he bought his own cottage in the Finger Lakes of central New York. He didn’t feel like […]